The Surgeon
Volume 8, Issue 5 , Pages 252-258, October 2010

Nipple discharge and the efficacy of duct cytology in evaluating breast cancer risk

  • Roisin T. Dolan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
    • UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Ireland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Tel.: +353 1 716 6700.
  • ,
  • Joseph S. Butler

      Affiliations

    • Department of Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
    • Mater-UCD Clinical Research Centre, UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  • ,
  • Malcolm R. Kell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
    • Mater-UCD Clinical Research Centre, UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  • ,
  • Thomas F. Gorey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  • ,
  • Maurice A. Stokes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Received 20 January 2010; received in revised form 28 February 2010; accepted 29 March 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Nipple discharge accounts for up to 5% of referrals to breast surgical services. With the vast majority of breast carcinomas originating in the ductal system, symptomatic dysfunction of this system often raises disproportionate clinical concern. The aim of this study is firstly, to evaluate the clinical importance of nipple discharge as an indicator of underlying malignancy and secondly, to assess the diagnostic application of duct cytology in patients presenting with nipple discharge.

Study design

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients presenting with nipple discharge as their primary symptom to the symptomatic breast unit at a tertiary referral center over a 30-month period (n = 313). The Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) System and BreastHealth database were used to identify our study cohort. Parameters evaluated included patient demographics, clinical presentation, clinical evaluation, radiological assessment and histological/cytological analysis.

Results

Three-hundred and thirteen patients presented with nipple discharge as their primary complaint. Invasive breast carcinoma was diagnosed by Triple Assessment in 5% of patients. 24% of patients presenting with nipple discharge underwent nipple aspiration and cytological analysis. Duct cytology was diagnostic of the underlying breast carcinoma in 50% of triple assessment diagnosed carcinoma. Four risk factors were identified as having a significant association with breast carcinoma, these included (a) age >50 years (p < 0.0001), (b) bloody nipple discharge (p < 0.008), (c) presence of a breast lump (p < 0.0001) and (d) single duct discharge (p < 0.006).

Conclusions

Nipple discharge is a poor indicator of an underlying malignancy. Use of nipple aspiration and duct cytology for the assessment of nipple discharge is of limited diagnostic benefit. However, by utilizing the systematic, gold standard approach of Triple Assessment (clinical, radiological and cytological evaluation), the risk of underlying carcinoma can be accurately defined.

Keywords: Breast carcinoma, Nipple discharge, Duct cytology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1479-666X(10)00126-5

doi:10.1016/j.surge.2010.03.005

The Surgeon
Volume 8, Issue 5 , Pages 252-258, October 2010