Effect of deferred treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures☆
Received 14 October 2009; accepted 22 October 2009.
Abstract
Purpose
Timing of surgery remains a controversial topic in the treatment of the supracondylar humeral fracture. In our institution, patients are not brought to theatre after midnight, except in the ‘life or limb’ situation. We hypothesised that time to surgery has no significant influence on complication rate with supracondylar fracture of the humerus.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of all patients who required operative intervention for supracondylar fractures of humerus between 2004 and 2006. Patients' charts were assessed for demographic details, fracture type, time to theatre and complications. Statistical comparisons were performed between different fracture grades.
Results
We identified 124 supracondylar fractures of humerus that required operative intervention between 2004 and 2006. Fractures were mainly treated with operative manipulation with medial and lateral crossed K-wire fixation. Gartland III and flexion type fractures had a significantly shorter time to surgery than Gartland II (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in complication rate between fractures operated after midnight or deferred until the morning (p=0.68). Most common complications identified were ulnar nerve palsy and AIN palsy.
Conclusions
We have found no difference in complication rates when treatment of supracondylar fractures is delayed. Supracondylar fractures which are not grossly displaced, have no neurovascular deficit or risk of skin compromise, can be safely deferred without an increased risk of complication. Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures can be delayed until the next morning, except in the ‘life or limb’ situation.
Department of Orthopaedics, Temple St. Children's University Hospital, Temple St, Dublin 1, Ireland
Corresponding author at: Department of Orthopaedics, Temple Street Children's University Hospital, Temple Street, Dublin 1, Ireland. Tel.: +353 87 9027885.
ABSTRACT